- Title
- Improvements in hope, engagement and functioning following a recovery-focused sub-acute inpatient intervention: a six-month evaluation
- Creator
- Hollier, Tanya M.; Frost, Barry G.; Michie, Patricia T.; Lewin, Terry J.; Sly, Ketrina A.
- Relation
- Psychiatric Quarterly Vol. 92, Issue 4, p. 1611-1634
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11126-021-09934-7
- Publisher
- Springer
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2021
- Description
- Few studies have examined the post-discharge benefits associated with recover-oriented programs delivered in inpatient and sub-acute mental health settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term outcomes of a 6-week sub-acute inpatient intervention program for 27 service users with a diagnosis of serious mental illness (mean age = 33.22 years, 70.4% with a psychosis diagnosis). Recovery data were collected on admission, at discharge, and at 3- and 6-months post-discharge using self-report, collaborative and clinical measures. The three clinician-rated measures (assessing therapeutic engagement, functioning, and life skills) revealed linear improvements from admission to 6-month follow-up (with mean z-change ranging from 0.72 to 1.35), as did the self-reported social connection measure (Mental Health Recovery Star, MHRS; mean z-change: 1.05). There were also curvilinear improvements in self-determination and self-reported MHRS symptom management and functioning scores; however, only modest changes were detected in hope (Herth Hope Index) and MHRS self-belief scores. Change scores based on self-reported and clinician-rated measures tended to be uncorrelated. An exploration of client-level outcomes revealed three recovery trajectory subgroups: transient (21.7%), gradual (34.8%), or sustained (43.5%) improvement; with members of the latter group tending to have longer illness durations. The study’s findings are encouraging, to the extent that they demonstrate recovery-focused sub-acute inpatient programs can promote clinical recovery and aspects of personal recovery. However, they also suggest that recovery perspectives differ between clients and clinicians, and that far more work is required to understand the psychological factors that generate and sustain the hope that recovery is possible.
- Subject
- serious mental illness; hopefulness; self-determination; functioning; therapeutic processes; mental health services
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1472069
- Identifier
- uon:48753
- Identifier
- ISSN:0033-2720
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 695
- Visitors: 691
- Downloads: 0